Introduction: ER 901 is a critical rule in Washington evidence law that outlines the requirements for authenticating or identifying evidence before it can be admitted in court. This rule ensures that the evidence presented is what its proponent claims it to be, providing a foundation for the reliability and integrity of the judicial process. In this article, we will explore the key aspects of ER 901, its applications, and the different methods used to authenticate or identify evidence.
Key Provisions of ER 901:
- General Requirement for Authentication: ER 901(a) establishes that for evidence to be admissible, it must be authenticated or identified as genuine. This means that the party presenting the evidence must provide sufficient proof that the evidence is indeed what they claim it to be. This requirement is a safeguard to ensure that the evidence is reliable and can be trusted by the court.
- Illustrative Examples of Authentication: ER 901(b) provides a non-exhaustive list of examples to illustrate how evidence can be authenticated or identified. These examples include:
- Witness Testimony: A witness with firsthand knowledge can testify that the evidence is what it is claimed to be.
- Handwriting Identification: A non-expert can offer an opinion on the authenticity of handwriting based on familiarity with the writing.
- Comparison by Experts: An expert witness or the court can compare the evidence with authenticated specimens to verify its authenticity.
- Distinctive Characteristics: The appearance, contents, or other distinctive features of the evidence can be used in conjunction with surrounding circumstances to establish authenticity.
- Voice Identification: A voice can be identified based on hearing it firsthand or through a recording, as long as there is a connection to the alleged speaker.
- Telephone Conversations: Evidence that a call was made to a particular number and the person answering was the intended recipient can authenticate a conversation.
- Ancient Documents: Documents over 20 years old can be authenticated if they are in a condition that raises no suspicion and are found in a likely place.
- Electronic Evidence: Emails can be authenticated through testimony that they were authored or sent from an address associated with the sender, or through distinctive characteristics that support their authenticity.
- Modern Applications: ER 901 has adapted to the digital age by including methods for authenticating electronic communications, such as emails. The rule recognizes the increasing use of digital evidence and provides guidance on how such evidence can be properly authenticated in court.
- Statutory or Rule-Based Methods: ER 901(b)(11) acknowledges that authentication or identification can also be achieved through methods provided by statute or other court rules. This flexibility allows the rule to adapt to various legal contexts and types of evidence.
Practical Implications: ER 901 plays a vital role in ensuring that only reliable and properly authenticated evidence is presented in court. Attorneys must be well-versed in the different methods of authentication and be prepared to establish the authenticity of their evidence or challenge the authenticity of the opposing party’s evidence.
For a complete understanding of the rule, you can review the full text of ER 901 here.
Conclusion: ER 901 is essential for maintaining the integrity of the evidence presented in Washington courts. By requiring proper authentication or identification, the rule ensures that the evidence is trustworthy and that the judicial process remains fair and just.
Additionally, explore our client resources here for more details on how we handle similar cases.
About Blanford Law:
At Blanford Law, we are committed to providing relentless, fair, and honest legal representation. With over 20 years of experience, Ken Blanford founded our firm on the belief that every client deserves respect and the best possible defense, free from assumptions or preconceived notions. If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges or has been injured due to someone else’s negligence, please contact us anytime at 253-720-9304 or email us at info@blanfordlaw.com.
