In Washington State, the rules governing the admissibility of evidence in legal proceedings are designed to ensure that the evidence presented is both reliable and authentic. One such rule is Evidence Rule 1002 (ER 1002), often referred to as the “Requirement of Original.” This rule is crucial in determining the validity of evidence, particularly when it involves writings, recordings, or photographs.
What is ER 1002?
ER 1002 states that to prove the content of a writing, recording, or photograph, the original item is required. This means that in most legal proceedings, the original document or media must be presented as evidence rather than a copy or reproduction. The rationale behind this rule is to prevent alterations, omissions, or inaccuracies that could occur in the process of duplicating the original.
However, there are exceptions to this requirement. ER 1002 allows for circumstances where copies may be used instead of the original, but these exceptions are specified by other rules adopted by the Supreme Court of Washington or by state statutes.
Why is the Original Required?
The requirement of the original is rooted in the need for authenticity and accuracy in legal proceedings. The original document, recording, or photograph is presumed to be the most reliable and accurate version of the content. By requiring the original, the court ensures that the evidence has not been tampered with or altered in any way that could affect its integrity.
Exceptions to the Rule
While ER 1002 emphasizes the importance of presenting the original, it also acknowledges that there are situations where it may not be possible or practical to produce the original. In such cases, other rules or statutes may allow for exceptions. These exceptions might include situations where the original has been lost or destroyed, or where it is not feasible to produce the original due to its nature or location.
For example, if a document has been destroyed in a fire, the court may allow a copy to be presented as evidence, provided that the circumstances surrounding the destruction of the original are adequately explained and documented.
Practical Implications in Legal Proceedings
In practice, ER 1002 plays a vital role in how evidence is handled in Washington courts. Lawyers must ensure that they have access to original documents or media when preparing for trial. Failure to produce the original when required could result in the exclusion of critical evidence, potentially impacting the outcome of the case.
For more detailed information on Washington’s Evidence Rule 1002, you can access the full text of the rule here.
Conclusion
Washington’s ER 1002 underscores the importance of authenticity and accuracy in legal proceedings by requiring the original writing, recording, or photograph to be presented as evidence. While exceptions exist, the rule serves as a safeguard against the potential for altered or inaccurate evidence to influence the outcome of a trial. Understanding and adhering to ER 1002 is essential for legal practitioners in Washington State.
This rule is part of the broader framework of evidence law in Washington, ensuring that the legal process remains fair, just, and based on the most reliable forms of evidence available.
Review our client resources here
Contact us anytime for your urgent legal needs.
About Blanford Law:
We are no-nonsense, relentless, fair, and honest. We are great listeners instead of fast talkers, that is just who we are. More than 20 years ago, Ken began practicing law with a deeply-seeded belief that every person has the right to the best legal representation available. He built his law firm on that belief. Another belief that he strongly adheres to is his fundamental belief that clients deserve respect, with no assumptions or preconceived notions. If you or someone you know is accused of a crime or injured as a result of the negligence of another, please have them call us at 253-720-9304 or email us info@blanfordlaw.com
