Under Washington law, artificial entities like corporations, LLCs, and bail bond companies cannot represent themselves in court. This includes appearing at hearings, signing pleadings, or making legal arguments without an attorney.
The case of Dutch Village Mall v. Pelletti, 162 Wn. App. 531 (2011), confirms that corporate representation in Washington court requires a licensed attorney. Business owners—even if they are the sole shareholder or managing member—are not permitted to represent the business entity unless they are also an attorney licensed in Washington State.
The Rule in Practice: Why Bail Bond Companies Must Hire Counsel
This issue frequently affects bail bond companies, especially in cases involving forfeitures or justifications. Many small business owners assume they can “speak for their company” at a hearing. But in Washington, courts treat artificial entities as separate legal persons. Only lawyers can represent them in legal proceedings.
Failing to comply with this rule can result in case dismissal, sanctions, or entry of judgment against the company—even if the underlying claim could have been defended successfully.
Legal Foundation: Dutch Village Mall v. Pelletti
In Dutch Village Mall v. Pelletti, a landlord sued a corporation for unpaid rent. The business owner attempted to represent the company at trial. The Washington Court of Appeals ruled this improper, reaffirming that corporations and other entities must be represented by licensed attorneys in court.
This case is now commonly cited in Washington forfeiture hearings and business litigation matters.
What Does “Artificial Entity” Mean in Court?
Artificial entities include:
- Corporations (S-corps and C-corps)
- Limited Liability Companies (LLCs)
- Partnerships
- Nonprofits
- Bail bond agencies and recovery businesses
Even if the company only has one owner, Washington courts still require legal representation by a lawyer.
What Should Bail Bond Companies Do?
If your company has been served with a lawsuit, notice of forfeiture, or court summons, you must retain a licensed attorney. Do not assume that appearing personally or sending a company employee will be enough.
At Blanford Law, we assist bail bond companies and other small businesses with legal representation in Washington courts. Whether you need defense in a bond forfeiture or guidance navigating court procedures, we’re here to help.
✅ Key Takeaways About Corporate Representation in Washington Court
- Corporations and LLCs cannot represent themselves in court.
- Bail bond companies must hire legal counsel for hearings and pleadings.
- Violating this rule can result in default judgment or dismissal.
- Dutch Village Mall v. Pelletti is the leading case on this issue.
📚 Additional Resources
▶️ Bail Bond Justification Process in Washington Courts
▶️ RCW 2.48.170 – Practice of Law Limited to Active Bar Members
▶️ Washington State Court Rules for Civil Procedure
▶️ Understanding Bond Forfeiture in Washington
Navigating the Complexities of Bail Bond Forfeiture: A Look at State v. All City Bail Bonds
This article discusses the legal complexities surrounding bail bond forfeiture as highlighted in the case of State v. All City Bail Bonds. It examines how the court interpreted the responsibilities of bail bond agents and the conditions under which forfeiture may occur.
Read more
Understanding the Legal Implications of Cash Bail Forfeiture: Insights from State of Washington v. Edward L. Jeglum—Is Cash Bail Different than Bail Bonds?
This article analyzes the case of State of Washington v. Edward L. Jeglum, focusing on the distinctions between cash bail and bail bonds. It outlines the implications of forfeiture in both scenarios and explores how courts view the obligations of defendants and bail agents.
Read more
Regan v. McLachlan: A Legal Analysis
This article provides a detailed legal analysis of the case Regan v. McLachlan, which addresses bail bond forfeiture. It examines the circumstances that led to the forfeiture and the legal precedents that were considered by the court.
Read more
Examining Automatic Exoneration of Bail Bonds: Insights from State v. French
This article explores the concept of automatic exoneration of bail bonds as discussed in State v. French. It highlights the legal framework that allows for the exoneration of bonds under certain conditions, and how this impacts defendants and bail bondsmen.
Read more
Washington Law Allows Bail Bonds to be Filed in Open Court (RCW 10.19.065)
This article discusses the implications of Washington law that permits bail bonds to be filed in open court. It outlines the procedural changes and what this means for transparency and accessibility in the bail bond process.
Read more
Areas of Practice: DUI & Alcohol Offences, Criminal Defense, Personal Injury, Domestic Violence and Traffic Infractions.
We service Roslyn and Tacoma, Washington State and surrounding areas.
Review our client resources here
Contact us anytime for your urgent legal needs.
About Blanford Law:
We are no-nonsense, relentless, fair, and honest. We are great listeners instead of fast talkers, that is just who we are. More than 20 years ago, Ken began practicing law with a deeply-seeded belief that every person has the right to the best legal representation available. He built his law firm on that belief. Another belief that he strongly adheres to is his fundamental belief that clients deserve respect, with no assumptions or preconceived notions. If you or someone you know is accused of a crime or injured as a result of the negligence of another, please have them call us at 253-720-9304 or email us info@blanfordlaw.com
