Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

The first season of Suits captivates audiences with its intense legal drama and complex characters. However, the actions of these characters often cross legal lines. If the events in Suits took place in Washington State, several crimes would have been committed. This article explores the criminal activities depicted in the first season through the lens of Washington State law.

1. Unauthorized Practice of Law (RCW 2.48.180)

The most significant crime in the first season is Mike Ross practicing law without a license. In Washington State, this would be a clear violation of RCW 2.48.180, which prohibits the unauthorized practice of law. Practicing law without a valid license is a misdemeanor, and anyone knowingly assisting in this act could also face charges. Harvey Specter, aware of Mike’s lack of credentials, would be implicated under this statute, facing serious legal repercussions.

2. Fraud (RCW 9A.60.020)

Mike Ross’s career at Pearson Hardman is built on fraudulent misrepresentation of his credentials. Under Washington’s RCW 9A.60.020, fraud involves knowingly making false statements or representations with the intent to deceive. This crime is a gross misdemeanor or even a felony, depending on the severity. Mike’s false claim of being a Harvard graduate is a prime example of fraud under this law.

3. Perjury (RCW 9A.72.020)

In several instances during the first season, characters provide false statements under oath, which constitutes perjury under Washington law. RCW 9A.72.020 defines perjury as making a materially false statement under oath, knowing it to be false. Perjury is a class B felony in Washington, punishable by up to 10 years in prison. Any false testimony given by characters in court would be a serious offense under this statute.

4. Obstruction of Justice (RCW 9A.76.020)

The characters in Suits frequently take actions that could be classified as obstruction of justice, such as hiding evidence or misleading law enforcement. In Washington, RCW 9A.76.020 makes it a crime to intentionally obstruct, impair, or hinder the administration of law. Obstruction is generally a gross misdemeanor, with penalties that can escalate depending on the circumstances.

5. Forgery (RCW 9A.60.020)

Creating fake documents to support Mike Ross’s fabricated credentials would be considered forgery under RCW 9A.60.020. Forgery involves falsely making, completing, or altering a written instrument with intent to defraud. In Washington, this is a class C felony, punishable by up to five years in prison and significant fines.

6. Conspiracy (RCW 9A.28.040)

Several characters could be charged with conspiracy under Washington law. RCW 9A.28.040 defines conspiracy as an agreement between two or more persons to engage in criminal conduct, with at least one taking a substantial step toward that crime. The conspiracy to hide Mike Ross’s unauthorized practice, involving multiple members of the firm, would be a clear violation of this law.

7. Bribery (RCW 9A.68.010)

Bribery appears in the first season when characters offer something of value to influence legal proceedings. Under Washington law, RCW 9A.68.010 defines bribery as offering or conferring any benefit with the intent to influence the actions of a public servant or party involved in legal matters. This crime is a class B felony, with severe penalties including imprisonment and heavy fines.

Conclusion

The first season of Suits is filled with compelling legal drama, but many of the actions taken by the characters would be serious criminal offenses under Washington law. From unauthorized practice and fraud to perjury and conspiracy, these crimes would carry significant legal consequences in the real world. For viewers, Suits offers an entertaining look at the legal world, but it also serves as a reminder that real-life legal practice must adhere to strict ethical and legal standards.

Review our client resources here

Contact us anytime for your urgent legal needs.

About Blanford Law:

We are no-nonsense, relentless, fair, and honest. We are great listeners instead of fast talkers, that is just who we are. More than 20 years ago, Ken began practicing law with a deeply-seeded belief that every person has the right to the best legal representation available. He built his law firm on that belief. Another belief that he strongly adheres to is his fundamental belief that clients deserve respect, with no assumptions or preconceived notions.  If you or someone you know is accused of a crime or injured as a result of the negligence of another, please have them call us at 253-720-9304 or email us info@blanfordlaw.com