The pilot episode of Suits, titled “Pilot,” introduces us to Harvey Specter, a top closer at Pearson Hardman, and Mike Ross, a brilliant college dropout with a photographic memory. This episode is packed with legal intrigue, and many of the actions depicted could be considered criminal under Washington State law. Let’s break down the key events and analyze them through the lens of Washington law.

1. Fraud and Misrepresentation

A major plot point in the episode is the fraudulent hiring of Mike Ross as a lawyer at Pearson Hardman. Despite not having a law degree or attending law school, Mike is hired by Harvey Specter, who overlooks these facts due to Mike’s impressive skills.

Washington Law: Under RCW 9A.60.040, making false representations, especially in a professional context, is a crime known as criminal impersonation. If this scenario occurred in Washington State, both Mike and Harvey could face serious charges for fraud. Misrepresenting qualifications to gain employment, particularly in the legal field, could lead to criminal charges and severe professional consequences, including disbarment.

2. Possession of Marijuana

At the start of the episode, Mike is seen evading a sting operation set up to catch people purchasing marijuana. Although he escapes arrest, his involvement in possessing and intending to buy marijuana is clear.

Washington Law: While Washington State has since legalized recreational marijuana, it was illegal at the time of the show’s airing in 2011. Under RCW 69.50.4013, possession of a controlled substance was a criminal offense, either a misdemeanor or felony, depending on the quantity. If Mike had been caught during the sting operation in Washington before legalization, he would have faced criminal charges for possession.

3. Conspiracy to Commit Fraud

Harvey’s decision to hire Mike, knowing he lacks the necessary legal qualifications, could also be seen as conspiracy to commit fraud. By bringing Mike into the firm under false pretenses, Harvey is complicit in deceiving clients, colleagues, and the legal system.

Washington Law: Conspiracy to commit a crime is punishable under RCW 9A.28.040. This law makes it illegal to agree with someone else to commit a crime, with any steps taken toward completing that crime constituting criminal conspiracy. In Washington, Harvey’s actions could be interpreted as conspiracy to commit fraud, leading to potential criminal charges against both Harvey and Mike.

4. Obstruction of Justice

By hiring Mike and enabling him to practice law without a license, Harvey may also be guilty of obstructing justice. Obstruction of justice occurs when someone knowingly impedes the enforcement of the law or the administration of justice.

Washington Law: Under RCW 9A.76.020, obstruction of justice can be a gross misdemeanor or felony, depending on the severity. Harvey’s actions in facilitating unauthorized legal practice could be seen as obstructing the legal process, leading to criminal charges.

5. Professional Misconduct

Although not a criminal offense, Harvey’s decision to delegate a pro bono sexual harassment case to Mike, knowing Mike is unqualified, raises serious ethical issues. In Washington, this could lead to charges of professional misconduct and potential disbarment.

Washington Law: Professional misconduct is governed by the Washington State Rules of Professional Conduct. Lawyers are required to competently represent their clients and cannot delegate responsibilities to unqualified individuals. Harvey’s actions could result in professional sanctions, suspension, or even disbarment if found guilty of violating these ethical rules.

Conclusion

The pilot episode of Suits sets the stage for a series filled with legal and ethical challenges. If the actions depicted in this episode occurred in Washington State, they could lead to significant criminal charges, including fraud, conspiracy, and obstruction of justice. Understanding these potential violations highlights the importance of adhering to legal and ethical standards in the legal profession, emphasizing the serious consequences of disregarding these rules.

Review our client resources here

Contact us anytime for your urgent legal needs.

About Blanford Law:

We are no-nonsense, relentless, fair, and honest. We are great listeners instead of fast talkers, that is just who we are. More than 20 years ago, Ken began practicing law with a deeply-seeded belief that every person has the right to the best legal representation available. He built his law firm on that belief. Another belief that he strongly adheres to is his fundamental belief that clients deserve respect, with no assumptions or preconceived notions.  If you or someone you know is accused of a crime or injured as a result of the negligence of another, please have them call us at 253-720-9304 or email us info@blanfordlaw.com