Introduction: Understanding DUI and Reckless Endangerment Under Washington Law
In Washington State, driving under the influence (DUI) can lead to additional serious charges, including reckless endangerment under RCW 9A.36.050. The case of State of Washington v. Andrea Marie Rich highlights how intoxication and dangerous driving behaviors may cross legal thresholds, resulting in severe criminal penalties. This case explores the intersection of DUI laws, reckless endangerment, and the legal definitions that apply to these offenses.
Case Background: The DUI Arrest of Andrea Marie Rich
Andrea Marie Rich was arrested for driving under the influence after law enforcement observed her erratic driving. Her blood alcohol content (BAC) exceeded the legal limit in Washington State. In addition to the DUI charge, the State charged her with reckless endangerment under RCW 9A.36.050, arguing that her behavior posed a substantial risk of harm to others.
What is Reckless Endangerment in Washington State?
Under RCW 9A.36.050, reckless endangerment occurs when a person recklessly engages in conduct that creates a substantial risk of death or serious physical injury to another person. Unlike reckless driving, reckless endangerment focuses on the risk of harm rather than the vehicle operation itself.
Key Elements of Reckless Endangerment:
- Reckless conduct.
- Creation of a substantial risk of serious harm.
- No requirement that actual harm occurred.
Learn more about RCW 9A.36.050 – Reckless Endangerment.
How Does DUI Lead to Reckless Endangerment Charges?
In Washington, a standard DUI charge involves driving with a BAC of 0.08% or higher or being impaired by drugs or alcohol. However, when the driver’s actions put others in significant danger—such as swerving into oncoming traffic or driving at high speeds—prosecutors may also file reckless endangerment charges.
In Andrea Rich’s case, the prosecution claimed that her high intoxication level and dangerous driving behaviors met the legal threshold for reckless endangerment. This dual charge significantly increased the potential penalties she faced.
Court Decision: The Outcome of State v. Andrea Marie Rich
The court evaluated whether Andrea Rich’s conduct created a substantial risk of harm under RCW 9A.36.050. Ultimately, the court determined that her actions satisfied the elements of reckless endangerment. This case serves as a warning that driving under the influence can lead to enhanced criminal consequences if the behavior endangers others.
Key Takeaways: DUI and Reckless Endangerment in Washington
- DUI charges may escalate if the driver’s actions create a substantial risk of harm.
- Reckless endangerment does not require actual injury—only the creation of significant risk.
- Courts closely examine the driver’s level of intoxication and conduct when determining additional charges.
If you are facing DUI or reckless endangerment charges in Washington, consult an experienced attorney immediately. The legal thresholds for these offenses are complex, and the consequences can be life-changing.
Review our client resources here
Contact us anytime for your urgent legal needs.
About Blanford Law:
We are no-nonsense, relentless, fair, and honest. We are great listeners instead of fast talkers, that is just who we are. More than 20 years ago, Ken began practicing law with a deeply-seeded belief that every person has the right to the best legal representation available. He built his law firm on that belief. Another belief that he strongly adheres to is his fundamental belief that clients deserve respect, with no assumptions or preconceived notions. If you or someone you know is accused of a crime or injured as a result of the negligence of another, please have them call us at 253-720-9304 or email us info@blanfordlaw.com
