The first season of Suits draws viewers into the world of corporate law through the experiences of Harvey Specter and Mike Ross. While the show’s drama is captivating, many actions by the characters would constitute serious ethical violations under the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC). This article explores these ethical breaches and their implications under Washington law.
Unauthorized Practice of Law (RPC 5.5)
One of the most glaring ethical violations in Suits is Mike Ross practicing law without a license. According to Washington’s RPC 5.5, practicing law without proper authorization is strictly prohibited. Mike’s deception and the knowledge of it by Harvey Specter and other firm members would result in severe disciplinary action, including potential disbarment.
Conflicts of Interest (RPC 1.7)
Conflicts of interest arise throughout the first season, particularly involving Harvey Specter. In Washington, RPC 1.7mandates that a lawyer must avoid representing clients with conflicting interests without informed consent. The failure to manage these conflicts appropriately could lead to significant ethical violations.
Duty of Confidentiality (RPC 1.6)
The characters often share confidential client information without consent, violating Washington’s RPC 1.6. Lawyers are required to protect client confidentiality, and breaches would result in serious consequences under Washington law.
Dishonesty, Fraud, Deceit, or Misrepresentation (RPC 8.4(c))
Several characters engage in dishonest and fraudulent behavior, violating Washington’s RPC 8.4(c). The deception regarding Mike Ross’s credentials and other manipulations by Harvey Specter would be considered professional misconduct and could lead to suspension or disbarment.
Improper Communication with Represented Parties (RPC 4.2)
Harvey Specter communicates directly with represented parties without the necessary consent, violating Washington’s RPC 4.2. Such actions could lead to ethical sanctions and damage the lawyer’s professional standing.
False Statements to the Tribunal (RPC 3.3)
The show depicts characters making false statements to the court, violating RPC 3.3. Presenting misleading information to a tribunal would result in severe penalties under Washington law.
Duty to Report Professional Misconduct (RPC 8.3)
Several lawyers at Pearson Hardman are aware of Mike Ross’s lack of credentials but fail to report it, violating Washington’s RPC 8.3. The failure to report such misconduct is an ethical breach that could lead to disciplinary action.
Conclusion
The first season of Suits offers thrilling drama but also showcases numerous ethical violations that would have serious repercussions under Washington’s Rules of Professional Conduct. From unauthorized practice to breaches of confidentiality, the actions of the characters serve as a cautionary tale for the legal profession.
Review our client resources here
Contact us anytime for your urgent legal needs.
About Blanford Law:
We are no-nonsense, relentless, fair, and honest. We are great listeners instead of fast talkers, that is just who we are. More than 20 years ago, Ken began practicing law with a deeply-seeded belief that every person has the right to the best legal representation available. He built his law firm on that belief. Another belief that he strongly adheres to is his fundamental belief that clients deserve respect, with no assumptions or preconceived notions. If you or someone you know is accused of a crime or injured as a result of the negligence of another, please have them call us at 253-720-9304 or email us info@blanfordlaw.com
