In Washington State, certain misdemeanor offenses may be resolved through a compromise between the defendant and the injured party, as outlined in RCW 10.22.010. This statute allows for the dismissal of criminal charges if the victim agrees to a settlement, except in specific circumstances. These exceptions include crimes committed against law enforcement officers, during riots, with the intent to commit a felony, or domestic violence cases.
What is Compromise of Misdemeanor?
A compromise of misdemeanor allows the victim of a misdemeanor crime to accept a civil remedy instead of pursuing criminal charges. The aim is to provide a resolution that satisfies both the victim and the defendant, often leading to the dismissal of the criminal case.
When Compromise is Not Allowed
RCW 10.22.010 clearly outlines situations where a compromise is not permitted:
- Crimes Against Officers: Offenses committed against law enforcement or public officers while performing their duties cannot be compromised.
- Riotous Acts: Crimes committed in a riotous manner are excluded from compromise.
- Felonious Intent: If the misdemeanor was committed with the intent to commit a felony, compromise is not an option.
- Domestic Violence: Crimes involving domestic violence, as defined in RCW 10.99.020, cannot be compromised. This includes offenses between intimate partners or family members.
Legal Implications
The compromise of misdemeanor offers a pathway for defendants to avoid criminal convictions under specific circumstances, while providing victims a civil remedy. However, it is important to understand the exceptions and consult with a legal professional to navigate the process effectively.
For more details, visit the full statute here.
For more information on this topic, here are some additional articles you may find helpful:
1. Navigating ER 408: Compromise Evidence in Washington Civil Cases
This article explores the intricacies of ER 408, which governs the admissibility of compromise and settlement evidence in Washington State civil cases. It discusses how this rule promotes settlement negotiations by keeping compromise offers and related statements inadmissible in court.
2. Washington State Rule of Evidence 404: A Complex Rule with Important Exceptions
Delve into Washington’s Rule of Evidence 404, which generally prohibits character evidence to prove a person’s actions but allows for critical exceptions. This article covers when and how exceptions like prior bad acts and habit evidence can be introduced in court.
3. State v. Saunders: A Case Analysis on Speedy Trial in Washington State
In this case analysis, the article discusses State v. Saunders and the application of speedy trial rights under Washington law. It provides insight into how delays in criminal trials can impact the legal process and the potential consequences for both defendants and the state.
For any urgent legal needs, contact us anytime.
About Blanford Law
At Blanford Law, we are dedicated to providing relentless, fair, and honest legal representation. With over 20 years of experience, Ken Blanford founded this firm on the belief that every individual deserves the best legal support. We prioritize listening over fast talking, ensuring that our clients feel respected and understood, without any assumptions or preconceived notions.
Curious about what our clients have to say? Read our client reviews here.
If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges or has been injured due to someone else’s negligence, reach out to us today. Call us at 253-720-9304 or email us at info@blanfordlaw.com.
