ER 703 is a crucial rule in Washington State law that governs how expert witnesses can form and present their opinions in court. Understanding this rule is essential for legal professionals and anyone involved in a case requiring expert testimony.

What is ER 703?

ER 703, which stands for “Bases of Opinion Testimony by Experts,” outlines the types of facts or data that an expert can use to form their opinion. According to ER 703, the facts or data on which an expert bases their opinion do not necessarily need to be admissible in evidence, as long as they are of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the field.

This means that an expert witness can base their opinion on information they have gathered or have been provided, even if that information wouldn’t normally be allowed as evidence in court. The key is that the information must be something that experts in the field would typically rely upon.

Importance in Legal Proceedings

The application of ER 703 is critical in cases involving complex scientific, technical, or specialized knowledge. It allows experts to offer opinions that can significantly influence the outcome of a case, even if the underlying data isn’t directly admissible. This rule ensures that the court can consider expert insights that are grounded in the practices and standards of the expert’s profession.

Examples of ER 703 in Action

Consider a medical malpractice case where a doctor is called as an expert witness. Under ER 703, the doctor might base their opinion on medical records, patient histories, or other reports that they have reviewed. Even if those records aren’t admissible as evidence, the doctor’s opinion, formed based on these materials, can still be presented to the court.

In another scenario, an engineering expert might rely on technical data or industry reports to form an opinion about a structural failure. ER 703 allows the expert to testify about their conclusions, even if the data itself doesn’t meet the standards for admissibility.

Why ER 703 Matters

ER 703 matters because it broadens the scope of what can be considered in court through expert testimony. This can lead to more informed decision-making by the judge or jury, as they have access to expert opinions that are based on a wider array of information.

For legal practitioners in Washington State, understanding ER 703 is essential for effectively using or challenging expert testimony in court. If you’re facing a case that involves expert witnesses, consulting with experienced attorneys like those at Blanford Law can be invaluable. They can help you navigate the complexities of rules like ER 703 and ensure that your case is presented effectively.

Link to ER 703

For more detailed information, you can review the full text of ER 703 here.

Review our client resources here

Contact us anytime for your urgent legal needs.

About Blanford Law:

We are no-nonsense, relentless, fair, and honest. We are great listeners instead of fast talkers, that is just who we are. More than 20 years ago, Ken began practicing law with a deeply-seeded belief that every person has the right to the best legal representation available. He built his law firm on that belief. Another belief that he strongly adheres to is his fundamental belief that clients deserve respect, with no assumptions or preconceived notions.  If you or someone you know is accused of a crime or injured as a result of the negligence of another, please have them call us at 253-720-9304 or email us info@blanfordlaw.com

Additional Resources for Further Reading

Expand your understanding of legal processes and evidence rules in Washington State by exploring the following articles:

1. Understanding ER 706: Court-Appointed Experts in Washington State
   A detailed guide to how courts appoint neutral professionals to provide objective analysis in complex cases under ER 706.
2. Understanding ER 702: Testimony by Experts in Washington State
   Learn about the qualifications and criteria for expert testimony in Washington courts and how it impacts case outcomes.
3. 42 Blue Form: Substance Abuse Compliance
   An essential resource for understanding the 42 Blue Form process in Washington, commonly used in cases requiring substance abuse compliance documentation.
4. Understanding ER 610: Religious Beliefs or Opinions
   This article explains how ER 610 restricts the use of a witness’s religious beliefs or opinions to challenge their credibility in court.
5. Exploring Washington ER 602: The Essential Guide to Personal Knowledge in Court Testimony
   Dive into the importance of ER 602, which ensures that witnesses testify only about matters within their personal knowledge to uphold fair legal proceedings.

For more helpful resources and legal insights, visit the Blanford Law Articles Library.