The case of Lloyd Enterprises v. Longview Plumbing is a significant decision in Washington law that highlights the critical importance of legal representation for corporations involved in court proceedings. This case underscores the necessity for corporations to adhere to strict legal protocols, particularly when it comes to representation in legal disputes.
Case Background
The case began when Berry, Inc., a corporation led by Wade M. Berry, entered into a contract with Longview Plumbing Heating Co. to perform subcontractor work for the City of Federal Way and the Federal Way School District. Due to contractual disputes, Berry, Inc. found itself entangled in legal actions initiated by Longview Plumbing and Lloyd Enterprises, Inc.
Initially, Berry, Inc. was represented by an attorney, but the attorney later withdrew from the case. Wade Berry, not being an attorney, attempted to represent Berry, Inc. pro se (without a lawyer), filing legal documents on behalf of the corporation. This led to complications, as Washington law requires that corporations be represented by a licensed attorney in court.
Court’s Decision
The trial court struck all documents submitted by Wade Berry on behalf of Berry, Inc., citing the need for the corporation to be represented by an attorney. Despite being given additional time to comply, Berry, Inc. failed to file the necessary documents through a licensed attorney, resulting in default judgments being entered in favor of Longview Plumbing and Lloyd Enterprises, Inc.
The court also addressed an attempt by Berry to substitute Edgewood Limited Partnership as the real party in interest, following a merger with Berry, Inc. The court ruled that the merger did not exempt Berry, Inc. from the requirement to have legal representation, and dismissed the claims accordingly.
Key Takeaways
- Legal Representation Requirement: Washington law mandates that corporations must be represented by a licensed attorney in court proceedings. This case reaffirms that corporations cannot be represented pro se by individuals who are not attorneys.
- Court’s Discretion in Mergers: The court has the discretion to continue legal actions against a corporation even if it has merged with another entity, and the surviving entity must still adhere to legal representation rules.
- Consequences of Non-Compliance: Failure to comply with legal representation requirements can result in severe consequences, including the dismissal of claims and entry of default judgments.
For more detailed information, you can review the full text of the case here.
Review our client resources here
Contact us anytime for your urgent legal needs.
About Blanford Law:
We are no-nonsense, relentless, fair, and honest. We are great listeners instead of fast talkers, that is just who we are. More than 20 years ago, Ken began practicing law with a deeply-seeded belief that every person has the right to the best legal representation available. He built his law firm on that belief. Another belief that he strongly adheres to is his fundamental belief that clients deserve respect, with no assumptions or preconceived notions. If you or someone you know is accused of a crime or injured as a result of the negligence of another, please have them call us at 253-720-9304 or email us info@blanfordlaw.com