When a recognizance or bail bond is forfeited because a defendant fails to appear in court, Washington law provides a process under RCW 10.19.105 that allows a judge to vacate the forfeiture judgment if the defendant is produced in court in time. This statute is important for defendants and sureties because it can undo the financial consequences of a forfeiture judgment under the right circumstances. Washington State Legislature
Understanding Bail Forfeiture in Washington
Under Washington’s bail and appearance bond laws, if a person fails to appear as required, a forfeiture judgment may be entered against the defendant and any sureties who guaranteed the bond. A forfeiture judgment means the court has declared the bond forfeited and may issue execution against the defendant and sureties for the bail amount. Washington State Legislature
Before looking at RCW 10.19.105 specifically, under RCW 10.19.100, a forfeiture judgment’s execution can be stayed (paused) for 60 days if a bond is given with proper sureties. This stay allows time for the defendant to be brought back to court. Washington State Legislature
When a Forfeiture Judgment Can Be Vacated
RCW 10.19.105 provides that:
If a bond has been given and execution stayed, and the person for whose appearance the recognizance was given is produced in court before the expiration of the 60‑day period, the judge may vacate the forfeiture judgment “upon such terms as may be just and equitable.” If the defendant is not produced within that time, execution against the judgment debtors (including sureties) will go forward. Justia
In other words, timeliness is critical: the defendant must be present before the 60‑day deadline expires. If so, the court may — but is not required to — vacate the forfeiture. The decision often depends on equitable factors and the judge’s discretion. Washington State Legislature
Why This Matters for Defendants and Sureties
1. Avoiding Financial Loss
When a forfeiture is vacated, the defendant and sureties avoid paying the full bail amount as a judgment. This can mean significant savings, especially in high‑bail cases.
2. Encouraging Compliance with Court Orders
The statutory mechanism incentivizes defendants and sureties to ensure timely court appearances. Bringing the defendant to court within the 60‑day window is a key step to avoiding judgment.
3. Judicial Equity Power
The judge has flexibility under the statute to set terms for vacating the judgment that are “just and equitable,” which allows the court to account for the circumstances that led to the initial forfeiture. Washington State Legislature
What Happens If the Deadline Is Missed?
If the defendant is not produced in court within the 60‑day period set out in RCW 10.19.100, the court has no statutory obligation to vacate the forfeiture. In that case:
- Execution may issue against sureties and the defendant;
- The forfeiture judgment becomes enforceable like any other civil judgment; and
- Remedies may be limited to equitable arguments outside the statute’s protections. Washington State Legislature
Practical Tips for Navigating Forfeiture and Vacatur
- Act quickly: Time limits matter. Ensure the defendant is brought to court before the 60‑day deadline under RCW 10.19.100.
- Work with counsel: An experienced attorney can help file the necessary motions and advocate for equitable vacatur terms.
- Know your rights: Whether you’re a defendant or a surety, understanding how forfeiture and vacatur work can guide your decisions and legal strategy.
Review our client resources here
Contact us anytime for your urgent legal needs.
About Blanford Law:
We are no-nonsense, relentless, fair, and honest. We are great listeners instead of fast talkers, that is just who we are. More than 20 years ago, Ken began practicing law with a deeply-seeded belief that every person has the right to the best legal representation available. He built his law firm on that belief. Another belief that he strongly adheres to is his fundamental belief that clients deserve respect, with no assumptions or preconceived notions. If you or someone you know is accused of a crime or injured as a result of the negligence of another, please have them call us at 253-720-9304 or email us info@blanfordlaw.com

Additional Resources
- Stay of Forfeiture Judgment in Washington
Explains the process and legal basis for requesting a stay of forfeiture judgment under Washington law.
https://blanfordlaw.com/stay-of-forfeiture-judgment-washington/ - Understanding RCW 10.19.100: A Guide to Staying Forfeiture Judgments in Washington
A detailed breakdown of RCW 10.19.100 and its significance in forfeiture proceedings.
https://blanfordlaw.com/understanding-rcw-10-19-100-a-guide-to-staying-forfeiture-judgments-in-washington/ - ER 902: Self-Authentication
Discusses the Washington rules of evidence regarding documents that are considered self-authenticating.
https://blanfordlaw.com/er-902-self-authentication/ - RCW 9A.16.040: Deadly Force
Provides legal context for when deadly force is justifiable under Washington law.
https://blanfordlaw.com/rcw-9a16040-deadly-force/ - State v. Brandon Sargent
Case analysis highlighting legal arguments related to forfeiture and due process in Washington.
https://blanfordlaw.com/state-v-brandon-sargent/