State v Stephenson Jury Unanimity Case in Washington Law
The case of State v. Stephenson is a significant Washington Court of Appeals decision that highlights critical issues involving jury unanimity in criminal trials. Decided on December...
Dukes of Hazzard Crimes Under Washington Law
The Dukes of Hazzard (2005), based on the popular TV series, is a comedy-action film that follows the adventures of cousins Bo and Luke Duke as...
I-90 Snoqualmie Pass Traffic Alert: Labor Day Delays Expected
I-90 Westbound Traffic Alert Near Snoqualmie Pass for Labor Day Weekend Focus Keyphrase: I-90 Snoqualmie Pass traffic alert As Labor Day weekend approaches, Washington drivers...
RCW 46.61.672 Distracted Driving Law: Washington Hands-Free Rules Explained
Distracted driving is a growing concern in Washington State, leading to accidents, injuries, and fatalities. To address this issue, RCW 46.61.672—also known as the Driving Under the...
Allstate v Batacan UIM Dispute: Washington Coverage & Liability Limits
Background of the Case The case of Allstate Insurance Company v. Remedios and Saturino Batacan, decided by the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2, on...
WAC 308-19-200 Bail Bond Location Rules for Washington Agencies
Bail bond agencies and bail bond agents in Washington State must adhere to specific rules and regulations to operate legally and effectively. One crucial regulation...
Mad Max Fury Road Crimes Under Washington Law: Kidnapping, Assault & More
Mad Max: Fury Road (2015) is a post-apocalyptic action film set in a desolate, dystopian future where society has collapsed, and violent warlords control scarce resources....
WAC 308-19-210 Bail Bond Rules: Agency Location Compliance in Washington
Compliance with Washington licensing laws is critical for bail bond agencies to operate lawfully and maintain good standing. One key regulation, WAC 308-19-210, outlines the procedures agencies must...
State v O’Neal Reckless Endangerment Case: RCW 9A.36.050 in Washington Law
Reckless endangerment is a serious criminal charge in Washington State, requiring clear proof of substantial risk. The landmark case of State v. O'Neal, 23 Wn. App. 899,...
State v Teems Speedy Trial Case: CrR 3.3 & Dismissal Under CrR 8.3(b)
The Washington Court of Appeals decision in State v. Jimmy R. Teems (1997) explores a defendant’s right to a speedy trial under Washington's Criminal Rules of Procedure (CrR...