ER 704 is an important rule in Washington State law that addresses how expert witnesses can present their opinions in court, especially when those opinions relate directly to the key issues being decided by the judge or jury.
What is ER 704?
ER 704, or “Opinion on Ultimate Issue,” allows expert witnesses to testify and provide opinions on issues that the trier of fact (judge or jury) is responsible for deciding. This means that if an expert’s testimony directly addresses the ultimate issue in a case—such as whether a defendant is guilty or a contract was breached—their opinion is not automatically objectionable simply because it touches on the core decision to be made.
According to ER 704, as long as the testimony is otherwise admissible, it can embrace the ultimate issue at hand. This rule is designed to ensure that the court can hear valuable insights from experts, even when their opinions bear directly on the decisions that the court must make.
Significance in Legal Proceedings
ER 704 plays a crucial role in many legal cases, particularly those involving complex technical, scientific, or specialized knowledge. For instance, in a criminal case, an expert witness might testify about the mental state of the defendant at the time of the crime. While this testimony could influence the jury’s determination of guilt, ER 704 allows the testimony as long as it meets other admissibility standards.
The rule ensures that expert opinions are not excluded merely because they address the key issues in a case, allowing the court to make a fully informed decision based on all available evidence.
Examples of ER 704 in Action
- Criminal Cases: An expert in forensic psychology may testify about a defendant’s mental state, directly influencing the jury’s decision on whether the defendant had the capacity to commit the crime.
- Civil Cases: An engineer might provide an opinion on whether a product design was defective, directly affecting the court’s ruling on liability.
In both scenarios, ER 704 ensures that these expert opinions are heard and considered, even though they pertain directly to the case’s ultimate issue.
Why ER 704 Matters
The application of ER 704 is critical for ensuring that expert testimony can fully inform the court’s decision-making process. By allowing experts to provide opinions on ultimate issues, the rule helps the trier of fact to understand complex matters that are essential to reaching a verdict or judgment.
For legal practitioners in Washington State, understanding ER 704 is vital for effectively using expert testimony to support your case. If you’re involved in a legal matter where expert opinions are key, consulting with experienced attorneys like those at Blanford Law can be invaluable.
Link to ER 704
For more detailed information, you can review the full text of ER 704 here.
Review our client resources here
Contact us anytime for your urgent legal needs.
About Blanford Law:
We are no-nonsense, relentless, fair, and honest. We are great listeners instead of fast talkers, that is just who we are. More than 20 years ago, Ken began practicing law with a deeply-seeded belief that every person has the right to the best legal representation available. He built his law firm on that belief. Another belief that he strongly adheres to is his fundamental belief that clients deserve respect, with no assumptions or preconceived notions. If you or someone you know is accused of a crime or injured as a result of the negligence of another, please have them call us at 253-720-9304 or email us info@blanfordlaw.com
Additional Resources on Washington Evidence Rules
For more information on expert testimony and other key evidentiary rules in Washington State, explore these related articles:
Understanding ER 703: Bases of Opinion Testimony by Experts
ER 703 determines how expert witnesses may form their opinions based on facts or data. This article explores the standards for admissibility, how courts evaluate expert conclusions, and the implications for legal proceedings.
Understanding ER 706: Court-Appointed Experts
ER 706 allows courts to appoint their own experts to provide unbiased evaluations in complex cases. Learn how court-appointed experts operate, their role in litigation, and how their testimony affects legal outcomes.
Understanding ER 702: Testimony by Experts
ER 702 sets the foundation for when and how expert witnesses can testify in Washington courts. This article discusses qualifications, the reliability of expert opinions, and how the rule aligns with federal standards.
Understanding ER 610: Religious Beliefs or Opinions
ER 610 prohibits using a witness’s religious beliefs to attack their credibility. This article explains the scope of the rule, its exceptions, and how it protects witnesses from bias in court.
Exploring Washington ER 602: The Essential Guide to Personal Knowledge in Court Testimony
ER 602 requires that a witness must have personal knowledge of a matter to testify about it. This article breaks down how courts determine personal knowledge and the impact of the rule on admissibility.
