RPC 1.3, part of the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct, emphasizes the critical role of diligence in legal practice. This rule mandates that lawyers act with reasonable diligence and promptness when representing clients, ensuring that their interests are effectively pursued without unnecessary delays.

Read the full text of RPC 1.3 here.

Key Elements of RPC 1.3

1. Commitment and Dedication to Client Interests

RPC 1.3 requires lawyers to commit fully to their clients’ cases, even when facing opposition, challenges, or personal inconvenience. Lawyers must take all lawful and ethical actions necessary to support their clients. However, this doesn’t mean pushing for every possible advantage or using aggressive tactics. Instead, lawyers are encouraged to exercise professional discretion in determining the best strategies to achieve their clients’ objectives while maintaining respect and courtesy toward all involved.

2. Managing Workload for Competence

To uphold the standard of diligence, lawyers must manage their workload effectively. Overcommitting can lead to delays, errors, and missed deadlines, which can negatively impact a client’s case. RPC 1.3 highlights the importance of balancing time and resources to ensure each case is handled competently and promptly.

3. Avoiding Procrastination

Procrastination is one of the most detrimental habits in the legal profession and is a common source of client dissatisfaction. Delays can severely affect a client’s interests, particularly in cases with strict deadlines like statutes of limitations. Even when delays don’t directly harm the case, they can cause unnecessary stress and undermine a client’s trust in their lawyer. RPC 1.3 stresses the importance of acting promptly to avoid these issues, while also allowing for reasonable postponements when necessary.

4. Seeing Cases Through to Completion

Once a lawyer takes on a case, RPC 1.3 requires them to see it through to the end, unless the relationship is properly terminated under RPC 1.16. If a case concludes with an adverse outcome, the lawyer must discuss the possibility of an appeal with the client before withdrawing. Clear communication about the status of representation is essential to prevent misunderstandings.

The Importance of Diligence in Legal Practice

Diligence is a cornerstone of effective legal representation. Clients depend on their lawyers to act promptly and efficiently, safeguarding their legal rights throughout the representation. Failure to act with diligence can harm the client’s case, damage the lawyer’s reputation, and result in disciplinary action under the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct.

Conclusion

RPC 1.3 underscores the necessity of diligence in legal practice. Lawyers must act promptly and with dedication to their clients’ interests. By managing their workload effectively, avoiding procrastination, and following through on their commitments, lawyers can meet the high standards expected in the legal profession.

For more information, read the full text of RPC 1.3 here.

Review our client resources here

Contact us anytime for your urgent legal needs.

About Blanford Law:

We are no-nonsense, relentless, fair, and honest. We are great listeners instead of fast talkers, that is just who we are. More than 20 years ago, Ken began practicing law with a deeply-seeded belief that every person has the right to the best legal representation available. He built his law firm on that belief. Another belief that he strongly adheres to is his fundamental belief that clients deserve respect, with no assumptions or preconceived notions.  If you or someone you know is accused of a crime or injured as a result of the negligence of another, please have them call us at 253-720-9304 or email us info@blanfordlaw.com

Additional Resources

1. Understanding RPC 1.2: Scope of Representation and Client Authority in Washington State
   Read the full article here
   This piece offers a detailed overview of RPC 1.2, focusing on how attorneys and clients can effectively define the parameters of legal representation. It explores the boundaries of client authority, ethical obligations, and how these principles play out in Washington State.
2. Navigating the Complexities of Bail Bond Forfeiture: A Look at State v. All City Bail Bonds
   Read the full article here
   Analyzing the State v. All City Bail Bonds decision, this article delves into the legal and practical implications of bail bond forfeitures. It provides insights into how courts address forfeiture hearings, the responsibilities of bail bond companies, and tips for defendants navigating the process.
3. Colorado Supreme Court Rules Against Client Fee for Departing Lawyers
   Read the full article here
   The Colorado Supreme Court recently clarified that clients cannot be charged a fee simply because their lawyer departs from a firm. This article outlines the rationale behind the ruling, emphasizing clients’ rights to choose representation without financial penalties tied to attorney transitions.
4. Shocking Study: Philadelphia’s Private Defense Lawyers Miss More Court Dates Than Clients
   Read the full article here
   Highlighting a surprising trend, this study reveals that certain private defense attorneys in Philadelphia fail to attend court more often than their clients. The article discusses potential causes and consequences, raising important questions about legal ethics and professional responsibility.