Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

In Washington law, ER 701 addresses the circumstances under which lay witnesses can provide opinion testimony in court. The rule sets clear boundaries to ensure that such testimony is both relevant and reliable. This article explores the key elements of ER 701, its implications for legal proceedings, and its practical application in Washington courts.

What is ER 701?

ER 701 pertains to opinion testimony by lay witnesses—individuals who are not testifying as experts. According to this rule, a lay witness’s testimony in the form of opinions or inferences is restricted to those opinions or inferences that are:

  1. Rationally based on the perception of the witness: The opinion must be grounded in what the witness has directly observed or experienced.
  2. Helpful to a clear understanding of the witness’s testimony or the determination of a fact in issue: The opinion should aid the jury or judge in comprehending the witness’s account or resolving a specific factual question.
  3. Not based on scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge within the scope of ER 702: The opinion should not require specialized expertise, which is reserved for expert witnesses.

Practical Application in Court

In practice, ER 701 ensures that lay witnesses provide testimony that is both useful and grounded in their direct experiences, without encroaching on the territory of expert witnesses. For example:

  • Witnessing a Car Accident: A lay witness might testify, “The car was speeding before the crash,” based on their perception. However, they cannot testify about the precise speed unless they have specialized training or knowledge.
  • Behavior Observations: A lay witness might say, “He seemed angry,” if the observation is based on visible behavior such as shouting or gesticulating, which a typical person could interpret similarly.

Importance of ER 701

ER 701 is crucial for maintaining the integrity and clarity of legal proceedings. It ensures that lay witness opinions are admissible only when they contribute meaningfully to understanding the facts at issue, without overstepping into areas that require expert analysis. This distinction helps prevent confusion and maintains the evidentiary standards necessary for fair trials.

Conclusion

ER 701 plays a vital role in Washington legal proceedings by delineating the scope of opinion testimony by lay witnesses. It ensures that such testimony is based on direct perceptions and is helpful to the court while safeguarding the specialized domain of expert witnesses. Understanding and adhering to ER 701 is essential for legal practitioners to effectively present and challenge evidence in court.

You can read the text of ER 701 here: https://www.courts.wa.gov/court_rules/pdf/ER/GA_ER_07_01_00.pdf

Review our client resources here

Contact us anytime for your urgent legal needs.

About Blanford Law:

We are no-nonsense, relentless, fair, and honest. We are great listeners instead of fast talkers, that is just who we are. More than 20 years ago, Ken began practicing law with a deeply-seeded belief that every person has the right to the best legal representation available. He built his law firm on that belief. Another belief that he strongly adheres to is his fundamental belief that clients deserve respect, with no assumptions or preconceived notions.  If you or someone you know is accused of a crime or injured as a result of the negligence of another, please have them call us at 253-720-9304 or email us info@blanfordlaw.com