Navigating the legal landscape can be challenging, especially when it comes to understanding specific statutes like RCW 9.98.010. This law plays a crucial role in the Washington state legal system, specifically addressing the disposition of untried indictments, informations, or complaints against individuals already incarcerated. In this blog, we’ll break down the complexities of RCW 9.98.010, providing a clear, reader-friendly explanation of what it entails and its implications.
What is RCW 9.98.010?
RCW 9.98.010 is a statute in Washington state law that outlines the procedures for dealing with untried indictments, informations, or complaints when a person is already serving a prison term. This law ensures that individuals in custody are not left in legal limbo regarding other charges they may face.
Key Provisions of the Statute
1. 120-Day Rule for Trial
Under RCW 9.98.010, if a person in custody has pending charges, they must be brought to trial within 120 days after requesting a final disposition. This request must be made in writing to both the prosecuting attorney and the court where the charges are pending.
2. Exclusions from the 120-Day Period
Certain time periods are excluded from this 120-day timeframe, including:
- Arraignment, pretrial, trial, and sentencing for unrelated charges.
- Competency proceedings.
- Detention in a federal facility under non-state conditions.
3. Responsibilities of the Superintendent
The superintendent or their designee must inform relevant authorities about the inmate’s location and availability for trial. They also need to provide certificates containing various details about the inmate’s incarceration.
4. Right to Continuance
The court can grant continuances for good cause, ensuring fair treatment of the incarcerated individual.
5. Procedure for Requesting Disposition
The inmate’s request for final disposition must be accompanied by a certificate from the superintendent, detailing their incarceration status. This request and certificate are then forwarded to the appropriate legal authorities.
6. Inmate Notification
Inmates must be informed about any pending charges and their rights regarding these charges.
7. Effect of Escape
If an inmate escapes after making a request for final disposition, that request becomes void.
Implications and Importance
RCW 9.98.010 is significant because it ensures that individuals who are already incarcerated are not forgotten in the system regarding other charges. This statute provides a clear process for inmates to address pending charges and ensures that their rights to a timely trial are upheld. It also helps the legal system efficiently manage cases, preventing unnecessary delays and ensuring justice is served in a timely manner.
Understanding RCW 9.98.010 is crucial for anyone involved in the legal system in Washington State, whether as a legal professional, inmate, or family member of someone in custody. By outlining clear procedures and rights, this statute plays a vital role in maintaining the integrity and efficiency of the state’s legal processes.
In conclusion, RCW 9.98.010 is a vital component of Washington state law, providing a clear and fair process for handling untried indictments, informations, or complaints against incarcerated individuals. By understanding this statute, we can better navigate the complexities of the legal system and ensure the rights of those in custody are protected.
Additional Resources
- Understanding Washington State Rule of Evidence 411: The Impact of Liability Insurance Evidence inLegal Proceedings This article explores Rule 411, which governs the admissibility of liability insurance evidence in Washington courts, clarifying when such evidence can and cannot be used in legal proceedings.
- State v. Morris and the Intrastate Detainers Statute in Washington State (126 Wn. 2d 306, Wash. 1995) A review of the State v. Morris case, which addresses Washington’s intrastate detainers statute, shedding light on how this law impacts the processing of inmates awaiting trial within the state.
- Court-Appointed Lawyers Targeted in Stolen Check Fraud Scheme: Six Charged This article discusses a fraud scheme involving stolen checks, where court-appointed lawyers were targeted. It highlights the legal implications and the charges brought against the individuals involved.
- How to Send Mail to an Inmate at Pierce County Jail A guide providing step-by-step instructions on how to send mail to inmates at Pierce County Jail, including rules, restrictions, and helpful tips to ensure successful delivery.
- Understanding Your Right to a Speedy Trial: Insights from State of Washington v. Brandon JamesSargent This article discusses the constitutional right to a speedy trial, using the State v. Sargent case to explain how Washington courts evaluate whether this right has been violated.
- How to Deposit Money for Inmates at Pierce County Jail: A Comprehensive Guide This guide provides an overview of the process for depositing money into an inmate’s account at Pierce County Jail, including the various methods available and important considerations.
- State v. Richman (85 Wn. App. 568, Wash. Ct. App. 1997): A Landmark Ruling on the InevitableDiscovery Rule in Washington A detailed analysis of the State v. Richman case, focusing on the Washington Court of Appeals’ ruling that reinforced the inevitable discovery doctrine, allowing evidence to be admissible even if initially obtained unlawfully.
- Understanding Washington Rule of Evidence 413 in Criminal and Civil Cases This article explains Rule 413, which governs the admissibility of evidence related to prior sexual offenses in criminal and civil cases in Washington, exploring its application and impact.
- Navigating Washington Evidence Rule 412: Implications for Sexual Offense Cases in Civil Proceedings A look at Rule 412, which restricts the admissibility of a victim’s past sexual behavior in sexual offense cases, offering insight into how this rule protects victims’ privacy in both civil and criminal trials.
- Understanding RCW 9.98.010: A Guide to Untried Indictment Procedures in Washington State This article provides an overview of RCW 9.98.010, which deals with untried indictments in Washington State. It explains how defendants can request speedy trials for charges pending in other jurisdictions within the state.
These resources offer valuable insights into Washington’s rules of evidence, important case law, and procedural guidelines, helping readers better understand the legal landscape.
Review our client resources here
Contact us anytime for your urgent legal needs.
About Blanford Law:
We are no-nonsense, relentless, fair, and honest. We are great listeners instead of fast talkers, that is just who we are. More than 20 years ago, Ken began practicing law with a deeply-seeded belief that every person has the right to the best legal representation available. He built his law firm on that belief. Another belief that he strongly adheres to is his fundamental belief that clients deserve respect, with no assumptions or preconceived notions. If you or someone you know is accused of a crime or injured as a result of the negligence of another, please have them call us at 253-720-9304 or email us info@blanfordlaw.com
